Ms. Hartman claims that there is no reason for nervousness on the part of the U.S. Graduation Dresses Government
nor U.S. corporations that have prospered because of the INTERNET that
justice for her would be problematic . She is above all a patriot . The
government provided the funding , research , and development for the
Internt. The telecom industry which already existed provided the
technology . However Ms. Hartman claims that it was her ideas thatgraduation dresses 2013
transformed what was just another communications network and changed it
into the successful INTERNET of today which brings trillions of dollars
into the economy . That she should be overlooked is a travesty and an
abomination . Without her ideas , the Internet as we know it would not
even exist . Technology played its role and has been rewarded with
billions of dollars for those who have enjoyed success . However , her
ideas made the technology successful and felt all over the world .
Therefore she is as much an integral part as any others and is due the
same respect and rights as any other cheap prom dresses under 100 inventor
as well as acknowlegment and payment . This is simply not a case of
prejudice and refusal to award a loan or grant where merit of the
invention demanded , but it is the violation of constitutional rights of
the inventor whose invention short prom dresses was the catalyst for the success of others .
Her
business , Talk Shoppe Inc. Telecommunications Services was a prototype
and was designed to be a liason between those who did not own computers
in the early nineties and any available websites as only about 2% of
the population owned personal computers . The telecom network(s) had
been in existence Prom Dresses since
the late 1960's and the technology was well developed but underutilized
. Just the presence of about 30 years between the beginnings of what
some would refer to the internet or internetting projects and the
INTERNET of today which made its debut in 1994 shows the significance of
Hartman's contributions . Yet to this day, her ideas which were
contributors to the development of the Prom Dresses 2013 INTERNET have not been acknowledged or compensated .
The
U.S. intellectual property would have competed with the oil industry in
having a worthwhile commodity to trade to foreign countries . Instead a
lot of the technology ,cheap prom dresses 2013
broadband and other aspects of the INTERNET have been given away "free"
just to make it easier for those already connected in the technology or
global trade to prosper . This has contributed to huge prosperity for a
relatively few individuals as compared to the amount of additional
revenue that could have gone into the coffers of the American economy .
Hartman
says " The horses have left the barn . Be that as it may , other
countries now own their own INTERNET free and clear . Regarding my
domestic license application - that can still be used to correct the
injustice done to this inventor here . The means to turn our economy
around can be put into place placing short prom dresses 2013 the U.S. back on top and Number One again. "
Some
of the highly sensitive and personal information has been removed from
the downloadable files which you will find on page 25 of HARTMAN
INTERNET INVENTION FILES, 2 that the submission was witnessed by a
notary seal - signed and notarized March 12 , 1990 almost 30 years after
the founding of the preexisting Short Prom Dresses telecommunications network and 4 years before the debut of the INTERNET .
Her
writings served as the templates or molds which Ms. Hartman claims were
instrumental in changing the prior telecom network from its previous
structure which was flailing . Some portions of the preexisting network
were being phased out it was revitalized by work through the NSFNET - a
structure maintained by the National Science Foundation and which
Hartman alleges used her ideas on Commercialization to change and
improve the preexisting network .
Dorothy M. Hartman alleges that
the "INTERNET" was her invention when it was just ideas in her head
conveyed to employees of the U.S. government in her proposals submitted
to them in 1990-1991 . She alleges that it was her invention when she
filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 2004 after
years of being ignored . In 2004 , the INTERNET had still tens of
thousands of users and was just beginning to really take off . The
Patent Office held her patent application illegally she alleges for
another 8 years - during which time the INTERNET has continued to expand
and make trillions for the tech companies .
Now the Office
because of the size of the INTERNET wants to make unsustainable claims
regarding the "size" of the invention and claiming indefiniteness .
Hartman alleges that she is not cheap short prom dresses responsible
for government actions or inactions 20 years earlier or today . She is
an inventor and due the rights that any other inventor has - and Ms.
Hartman ventures to say if it were not for institutionalized racism and
prejudice - circumstances would be entirely different . She would have
received the credit due her and compensation long ago .
Ms.
Hartman says that she is not responsible for whatever prejudicial
attitudes which led the government to reject her requests for funding
and support for her own ideas . She alleges that short prom dresses under 100 she
was skipped over and her ideas attributed and assigned to phone and
computer networks as directed by the National Science Foundation .
Computer companies developed personal computers . More phone and cable
companies became internet service providers . The makers of chips and
other hardware accessories , the software producers , Inexpensive Prom Dresses and other aspects of the industry got busy . The rest is history with chapters yet to be written .
She is the inventor of this business method which Affordable Prom Dresses revolutionized
the telecommunications industry and the way the world does business .
Hartman who invented this method when she was 46 years old is a senior
now but vows fight will continue.
没有评论:
发表评论